Indicator 1.2.2 - Population levels of selected forest-associated species
core indicator
Some forest-associated species rely on particular characteristics
of their habitat (e.g., stand age, forest structure,
ecological processes, stand composition) for their survival
and reproduction. Population levels of such species
are often monitored to indicate the status of other
species that are associated with similar habitat conditions.
The selection of forest-associated indicator species
should include species that are 1) from a variety of
forest habitat types; 2) from different taxonomic groups
(e.g., mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles) because
each of these groups responds differently to
stress; and 3) part of a long-term monitoring program.
The previous C&I report (CCFM 2000) used a selection
of species representative of three forest seral stages
(young, pole, mature). Although new information is
lacking for some, current data and trends for the same
species suggest that populations of most of these
species have been maintained or have increased
(Table 1.2a). The number of monitoring programs for
game animals such as moose, deer (mule and whitetailed),
black bear, grizzly bear, and wapiti (elk), and
furbearers such as fisher, lynx, and American marten
varies from one jurisdiction to the other. Collecting
data on these species across Canada's vast forest area
is difficult and expensive; thus estimates of population
numbers or trends are unavailable for some species
in some parts of the country. Still, monitoring these
species helps to ensure population stability and to
determine allowable harvest levels or to contribute
to the recovery planning of populations at risk.
A decade-long study showed that populations of the
American black bear and its habitat appear to be secure
in Canada (Williamson 2002). However, poaching
and illegal trade of gallbladders and other body parts
remain a concern. The quality of management for the
grizzly bear in Canada also appears to have improved
over the past years (Peek et al. 2003). In 2002,
COSEWIC assigned this species to the special concern
category. British Columbia grizzly bears make up
about half of the total Canadian population. In March
2003, an independent scientific panel, appointed on
recommendations from the International Association
for Bear Research and Management, confirmed that
the British Columbia government is managing grizzly
bears effectively and using sound population estimates
(Peek et al. 2003). British Columbia is currently
developing a provincial grizzly bear management
plan to address the panel's recommendations for
dealing with habitat issues, maintaining grizzly bear
populations, and establishing grizzly bear management
areas (CITES 2004).
Small furbearers are stable or increasing in just over
half of the provincial estimates, which collectively
represent large areas of these species ranges. American
marten, an indicator species for mature forest structure,
is the subject of a case study for Indicator 1.2.3. Lynx
populations are cyclical (10-year period) and are
considered stable in most of Canada.
Selected forest-associated ungulate populations are
either stable or increasing across Canada except for
woodland caribou in British Columbia and Alberta,
and moose in Nova Scotia. Woodland caribou populations,
associated with large tracts of undisturbed
old forests, are generally decreasing throughout their
distributions (see Indicator 1.2.3 for a case study on
this species). Declines in populations of American
marten or woodland caribou are important because
both occur in mature and old forests, areas where
forest management activities frequently take place.
Birds are useful indicator species for various reasons:
1) they are widely and easily monitored; 2) they
occupy a broad range of ecosystems; 3) their high
position in the food chain makes them sensitive to
changes at lower food chain levels; 4) they are the
best known and documented major taxonomic group
especially in terms of the sizes and trends of populations
and distributions; and 5) they are sensitive
to many kinds of environmental changes or disturbance
(BirdLife International 2004). Although selected
forest-associated bird species are monitored by a
variety of organizations in Canada, the Breeding
Bird Survey (BBS) provides the best compilation
available. Volunteers who drive along roads, stopping
at intervals to record species by their songs,
collect the BBS data. The BBS trend data between
1966 and 2003 suggest a decrease in populations of
some birds associated with old forests (Table 1.2b).
For example, the gray-cheeked thrush breeds in areas
with a closed canopy of small shrubs and a dense
understory, from spruce forests of the Boreal Shield
up to where tundra begins. The inclusion of beetles,
weevils, ants, caterpillars, cicadas, and other insects
in its diet helps to control destructive insect pests,
while the consumption of berries contributes to the
propagation of plants. The gray-cheeked thrush population
has continued to decrease since the last report.
Of the 32 selected forest-associated bird species
examined in the last report, two have been placed
in a higher category of risk after reassessment by
COSEWIC: the northern goshawk laingi subspecies
found on Vancouver Island and the Queen Charlotte
Islands, and the white-headed woodpecker. In addition,
the red crossbill percna subspecies, found in
Newfoundland, was designated endangered for the
first time by COSEWIC in May 2004. COSEWIC has
designated a total of 14 forest-associated bird species
(Table 1.2b). In Canada, the white-headed woodpecker
occurs only in extreme southern British Columbia and
there have been no significant changes in its distribution
over the past century. The white-headed woodpecker
has always been rare in the northern part of
its range, however, and the quality of its habitat has
undoubtedly declined over the last century as logging
has removed many of the mature ponderosa pines
in British Columbia and fire suppression has led to
denser forests of younger trees. These forests have
few snags for roosting and nesting, and produce fewer
pine cones (CWS 2004a). Although the trend for the
red crossbill percna subspecies in Canada between
1966 and 2003 is a decline of 1%, the Newfoundland
population decreased by 12.5% during the same time
period. The reason for this population's decline may be
competition for food (black spruce cones) with the red
squirrel. Red squirrels were introduced in 1963-1964
in Newfoundland to provide prey for the American
marten. The outcome of these interactions, both for
the woodpecker and the crossbill, underscores the
importance of understanding the functional relationship
of species in an ecosystem. Indicator 1.2.3
presents a case study on the northern goshawk.
Table 1.2a Population estimates (thousands) and trends by province/territory for selected forest-associated mammals. (Source: Provincial and territorial agencies unless otherwise indicated)
| Species |
Ecozones |
Age |
YK |
NT |
BC |
AB |
SK |
ON |
MB |
QC |
NB |
NS |
PE |
NLa |
|
| Black bear |
MC |
Y |
10b Sb |
10 S |
120–160 S |
? S |
30–40 S |
30 S or I |
75–100 I |
70 I |
16.5 I |
7–8 S |
0 X 1894 |
6–10 S |
| Grizzly bear |
MC, BP |
P |
5b Sb |
5.1 S or I |
17 S |
? S |
0 X 1900 |
0c Xc 1991 |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
| Fisher |
GL–SL |
P |
R ? |
0.6–2.4 S |
1.1–2.7 ? |
? S |
? ? |
10b Sb |
? S |
? S |
1b 1b |
1–3 Db |
0 X 1890 |
0 n/o |
| LynX |
BP, BS MC, AM |
Y Y |
7–55b Sb |
8–80 S |
? ? |
? S |
? ? |
5–75 S or I |
? S |
? |
0.7–5b Ib |
<1 D |
0 X 1800 |
6–43b Ib |
| Marten |
MC, BP BS, AM GL–SL |
M M Y |
60b Sb |
40–400 S |
? ? |
? S |
? ? |
80 S |
? I |
? S |
3b D |
<1 D |
0 X 1879 |
0.3 D |
| Moose |
MC,BP BS,GL-SL |
Y Y |
63b Sb |
30–40 I |
130–225 S |
100 S or I |
44.5 ? |
28 S |
114 I |
100 I |
22 S or I |
4.8-6 S or D |
0 X ? |
115 ? |
| Mule deer |
MC |
Y |
0.75b Ib |
? ? |
105–175 S |
157 I |
45 ? |
? ? |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
| Wapiti (elk) |
BP |
Y, P |
0.09b Ib |
? ? |
39.5–56 S or I |
29 S or I |
17.5 ? |
9 S |
0.45 S or I |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
| White-tailed deer |
GL–SL, AM C |
Y Y,P |
R ? |
? ? |
65–91 I |
239 I |
350-400 ? |
180 I |
300 I |
400 S |
80 I |
67 S |
0 n/o |
0 n/o |
| Woodland caribou |
MC BP, BS |
P,M P |
32b S |
13.2 ? |
16–20.5 S or D |
? D |
4.25 D |
<2.5 ? |
5d 16e S or D |
6–12d 0.14f S or Df |
0 X 1927 |
0 X 1925 |
0 X 1765 |
85g Sg |
Ecozones
MC: Montane Cordillera GL–SL: Great Lakes–St. Lawrence BP: Boreal Plains C: Carolinian (Mixedwood Plains) BS: Boreal Shield AM: Atlantic Maritime
Forest Age Class
Y: Young (shrub, sapling) P: Pole (pole, small tree) M: Mature and old
Values
S: Stable n/o: Never occurred R: Rare
I: Increasing ?: Unknown
D: Decreasing X: Extirpated with year of extirpation noted
a Newfoundland data do not include Labrador.
b Alvo (1998).
c COSEWIC 2002a .
d Boreal population.
e Forest–tundra migratory population.
f Gaspé population.
g COSEWIC 2002b.
Table 1.2b Status of selected forest-associated bird species (Canada population trends from the Breeding Bird Survey unless otherwise indicated). (Sources: Sauer et al. 2004; CWS 2003a, b, 2004b; Blackburn et al. 2001)
| Forest agea |
Species |
Canada population trend 1966-2003 |
COSEWIC designation |
|
| Young |
Lewis's woodpecker |
2.7% |
Special concern, Nov. 2001 |
| Golden-crowned sparrow |
No data |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Ruffed grouse |
-2.4%b |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Hairy woodpecker |
3.8%b |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Hooded warbler |
No data |
Threatened, Nov. 2000 |
|
| Pole |
Peregrine falcon pealei subspecies |
No data |
Special concern, Nov. 2001 |
| Flammulated owl |
No data |
Special concern, Nov. 2001 |
| Mountain chickadee |
0.1% |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Boreal chickadee |
-2.8% |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Red crossbill percna subspecies |
-1% |
Endangered, May 2004 |
| Varied thrush |
6.2% |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Barred owl |
-1.3%b |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Cooper's hawk |
4.4%b |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Ovenbird |
0%b |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Red-shouldered hawk |
2.7% |
Special concern, Apr. 1996 |
| Pileated woodpecker |
4.2% |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Red-bellied woodpecker |
8% |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Cerulean warbler |
Considered stable |
Special concern, May 2003 |
| Acadian flycatcher |
No data |
Endangered, Nov. 2000 |
| Bicknell's thrush |
No data |
SC (April 1999) |
|
| Mature |
Marbled murrelet |
-4% |
Threatened, Nov. 2000 |
| Northern goshawk laingi subspecies |
No data |
Threatened, Nov. 2000 |
| White-headed woodpecker |
No data |
Endangered, Nov. 2000 |
| Black-backed woodpecker |
-1.7% |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Three-toed woodpecker |
16.1%b |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Northern spotted owl caurina subspeciesc |
In decline |
Endangered, May 2000 |
| Hammond's flycatcher |
1.1% |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Boreal owl |
No data |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Gray-cheeked thrush |
-11.5% |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Eastern screech-owl |
No data |
Not COSEWIC-designated |
| Prothonotary warbler |
No data |
Endangered, May 2000 |
a Young: shrub, sapling; pole: pole, small tree; mature: mature and old.
b Very small sample size.
c The declining trend for northern spotted owl caurinasubspecies is documented at
http://wlapwww.gov.bc.ca/wld/documents/spottedowl.pdf. Accessed June 2006.